Introduction

The Donald Judd Foundation has taken legal action against Kim Kardashian for claims made in a promotional video where she attributes a set of tables to the late Minimalist artist Donald Judd. The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California, also targets the design firm Clements Design, alleging trademark and copyright infringement.

Background

The controversy arose from a 2022 promotional video released by Kardashian for her Skkn by Kim company, in which she showcases various designs, including what she refers to as “Donald Judd tables.” The Judd Foundation, responsible for managing Judd’s legacy, disputes the authenticity of the tables, asserting that they are not genuine Judd pieces.

Legal Allegations

The lawsuit accuses Kardashian of making inaccurate claims and suggests that consumers might believe there is a connection between Judd Foundation and Kardashian’s brand. Clements Design, the firm responsible for creating the contested dining set, is also implicated for allegedly infringing on Judd’s trademarks and copyrights.

Response from Clements Design

Clements Design has defended itself, stating that there are noticeable differences between its furniture and Judd’s designs, including variations in wood and proportions. The company claims to have sought an amicable resolution with the Judd Foundation but asserts that their claims have no merit.

Response from Kardashian

Kardashian’s team reportedly expressed regret to the Judd Foundation for any inconvenience caused and offered to update the video caption with a retraction. However, negotiations stalled when the Foundation demanded the removal of the video, recycling of the furniture, and a public statement from Kardashian.

Foundation’s Stance

The Judd Foundation maintains that the furniture in question is of lower quality than authentic Judd pieces and seeks to disassociate itself from Kardashian’s promotion. Despite Kardashian’s offer to promote the Foundation on social media, the Foundation insists on the removal of the video and disavowal of the furniture’s attribution.

Conclusion

As the legal battle unfolds, the dispute highlights the complexities of attributing design and the challenges faced by legacy organisations in protecting the integrity of an artist’s work. With both parties at an impasse, the outcome of the lawsuit remains uncertain, leaving questions about the intersection of art, commerce, and celebrity endorsement.

Feature Images: Donald Judd foundation sues Kim Kardashian for “false endorsement” of “knockoff” tables | courtesy: Dezeen

Keeping it Kute: The Numerous Fashion Moments of Kim Kardashian