India’s only daily art newspaper

Legal Battles Emerge Over Kahlo’s Image: Frida Kahlo Corporation Cracks Down on Unauthorised Merchandise


In the world of art and commerce, few figures loom as large as Frida Kahlo. Her iconic self-portraits, rich in symbolism and emotion, have made her image a staple in popular culture. However, behind the cultural ubiquity lies a complex web of legal battles and disputes over the rights to Kahlo’s likeness and legacy.

Lawsuits Galore: The Frida Kahlo Corporation Takes Action

On March 4th, the Frida Kahlo Corporation (FKC) made headlines by filing two lawsuits against online merchants. These legal actions accused the vendors of selling products related to the artist without proper authorisation. The corporation demanded either all profits from these alleged counterfeit sales or a hefty payout of $2 million for each unauthorised use of Kahlo’s trademarks.

According to FKC, the defendants’ products were deemed “virtually identical” or “substantially similar” to Kahlo’s works, constituting trademark infringement under US law. The corporation, based in Panama City, Panama, was established in 2004 by Kahlo’s niece Isolda Pinedo Kahlo, her daughter Maria Cristina Romeo Pinedo, and Venezuelan businessman Carlos Dorado. Holding nearly 30 trademarks associated with the artist, FKC has a vested interest in protecting Kahlo’s image and legacy.

A History of Disputes: From Barbie Dolls to Folk Art

Trademark litigation surrounding Kahlo’s legacy has not been without controversy, however. In 2018, the artist’s great-niece, Mara de Anda Romeo, won a temporary injunction against the sale of a Frida Kahlo Barbie Doll. Criticism arose over the doll’s lack of Kahlo’s distinctive features, including her unibrow, Mesoamerican wardrobe, and prosthetic leg. The dispute highlighted tensions between the commercialisation of Kahlo’s image and her deeply held political and social beliefs.

In another legal battle, Californian folk artist Cristine Melo filed a federal lawsuit against FKC in 2019. Melo aimed to halt FKC’s efforts to prevent her from selling Kahlo-inspired paintings, accusing Dorado of manipulating the Kahlo family into relinquishing control of Kahlo’s legacy. Despite the initial legal challenge, Melo eventually dropped her lawsuit, underscoring the complexities and challenges faced by artists seeking to pay homage to Kahlo’s legacy.

The Fight for Kahlo’s Legacy Continues

As legal battles rage on, the question of who rightfully owns Frida Kahlo’s image and legacy remains unresolved. While FKC seeks to protect Kahlo’s trademarks and prevent unauthorised use of her image, artists and activists continue to advocate for a more nuanced approach that respects Kahlo’s artistic vision and political ideals. In a world where art and commerce intersect, the battle over Kahlo’s legacy serves as a reminder of the enduring power of her iconic imagery and the complexities of preserving artistic integrity in the face of commercialisation.

Feature Image Courtesy: Racked

The Frida Kahlo Wardrobe: The artist who wore art

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *